Wait…what? Did Nate Easley just try to keep Montbello-area students from speaking truth to power about the closure of their schools? Watch the video and judge for yourself…
So…maybe if he DID actually listen to student voices as he claims at the beginning at the video, perhaps he’d hear them say, “We don’t want you to carve up Montbello High,” sort of how these fine young people are saying here…
Thanks to EdNews for making the student video available.
Get a grip, Nate Easley. You were elected by the parents of these students to put their interests before any climbing up the political ladder you might have in mind.
SEE THE ALTERNATE PLAN THAT A-PLUS’ LAURIE ZELLER DOESN’T WANT YOU TO SEE!! (presentation follows below)…
Please join us as we roll out an alternate vision for improving the six schools now slated for closure/turnaround in the Montbello area. We need you to show up and be counted!
Here are the details:
Date: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 What: A-Plus Denver’s FNECC meeting Where: Rachel B. Noel Middle School, 5290 Kittredge St., Denver (here’s a map) Time: 6 p.m.
Thanks to the advocacy of members of this FNE coalition, which include members of the A-Plus Far Northeast Education Community Committee, we have been invited as a group to present our alternate plan. Our coalition includes the Black Education Advisory Council (BEAC), the Denver Classroom Teachers Association (DCTA), the Northeast Community Congress for Education (NCCE), assorted members of the Montbello community…and of course, DeFENSE.
Take a look at the plan, below, and feel free to tell us what you think by leaving a comment or emailing us at email@example.com. Now is the time to chime in!
reprinted with permission from the Denver Weekly News
By Roger K. Clendening
Residents representing neighborhoods in Northeast and far Northeast Denver last night called on Denver Public Schools (DPS) to put the brakes on “disastrous turnaround” plans for Montbello High School and northeast feeder schools or face a rebellion from citizen-taxpayers that could include a boycott of DPS schools. Black, Hispanic and Anglo residents, from Montbello, Green Valley Ranch, and neighborhoods in northeast, southeast and southwest Denver, met for hours Wednesday night at the Denver Broncos Boys & Girls Club to craft strategy and tactics in the war to stave off what many of them maintain is more than an educational plan they see as “disastrous” for current and future
Using millions in taxpayer-financed but Obama administration “turnaround” dollars, DPS says it will shut down Montbello High School’s comprehensive configuration, replacing it with a 9-12 grade collegiate prep academy for 150 to 200 students per grade that will grow one grade per year; collocate a new Denver Center for International Studies 6-12 grade magnet school within the building; and add a “high tech” early college.
Shut Montbello down “disastrously,” just like what DPS did at Manual High School, one neighborhood leader remarked, adding that fellow taxpayers committed to progressive rather than “disruptive” DPS school changes need to remember the history of Black and Brown citizens around the country who often had to resort to boycotts as an effective way to get what they deemed was the most equitable public education services for their children and grandchildren.
Moreover, “This is not just about education,” insisted Ron Bush, a long-time DPS employee who also owns real estate in Montbello and Green Valley Ranch. “It’s about gentrification and capitalization,” he explained.
Pay attention to shifting and often declining values of homes in Montbello and Green Valley Ranch, and how folks will “still” be getting offers for thousands more than their homes are appraised, Bush warned. Already, he noted, there are examples of homes getting sales offers of $150,000 more than their appraised value.
Remember, he said, who owns Green Valley Ranch. “Oakwood Homes,” his neighbors chimed in. Why do you suppose Oakwood Homes “adopted” Montbello High School years ago, one neighbor was heard to ask rhetorically. In an interview with DWN after the meeting, a DPS employee who requested anonymity out of fear of retribution by DPS, spoke, too, of the real estate issues related to DPS plans, and said she would answer that question this way: “Because these disastrous DPS changes – part of larger plans to privatize public education by businesses who will recapitalize with our school tax dollars – will better enable DPS and business to cleanse those schools, and these neighborhoods, of Blacks and Browns steered years ago to Montbello and Green Valley Ranch from Five Points and Park Hill to help gentrify those neighborhoods.”
Students, teachers, parents, and other residents committed to progressive, transformative changes in DPS schools, rather than the so-called “turnaround” plans for Montbello and its feeder schools, were urged to speak out at upcoming DPS meetings:
DPS’s “final report” to the community on these proposals is set for 6:00pm on Oct. 26 at Rachel B. Noel Middle School, 5290 Kittredge St. in Denver.
DPS Board, 900 Grant St. – November 8 – Special Public Comment on Turnaround Recommendations (Note: No time listed on the DPS website. Call 720-423-3210 to get the time of this “Public Comment on Turnaround Recommendations”) meeting
DPS Board – November 15 – Work Session 4:30 – 8:30pm
DPS – November 18 – Regular Meeting 5:00 – 6:30pm Public Hearing 6:30 – 7:30p (This is the meeting during which Board is scheduled to vote the Turnaround Recommendations for Montbello and others schools “Up” or “Down.” To get your name on the roster to speak at this meeting “for” or “against” the recommendations, you need to call the DPS office at 720-423-3210 no later than 5:00pm on Friday, November 12)
Hot off the presses, forwarded from a community ally:
Denver Public Schools has informed us it will recommend, starting with the next school year (2011-2012), that Manny Martinez Middle School no longer enroll any students for the 6th grade. Only 7th and 8th grade students will be able to attend Manny Martinez Middle School. Current 6th and 7th grade students at Manny Martinez, who advance to the next grade level, will be able to attend the school.
On Tuesday, October 26 from 7:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., a Community Meeting regarding the next steps for the School will be held in the West High School cafeteria. Superintendent Tom Boasberg, Chief Academic Officer Susana Cordova and Board of Education Vice President Arturo Jimenez will participate. We encourage you to attend.
In addition, the Board of Directors of Manny Martinez wants to provide you with the opportunity to discuss this potential change to the School. Therefore, immediately prior to the Community Meeting on Tuesday at 7:30 pm, we will hold a meeting for parents at 6:30 pm in the Manny Martinez Middle School Teachers Lounge, Room Number 214.
We hope you can attend both meetings.
Gabriel Trujillo, Principal
Ms. Judy Wolcott, Charter Board President
What is the deal with DPS not waiting until the community conversation is had before it makes these decisions? Don’t they report to the Board? Is the board falling asleep on the job?
Waiting for Superman could and should have been an inspiring call for improvement in education. It is stuck in a framework that says that reform and leadership means doing things, like firing a bunch of people or “turning around” schools despite the fact that there’s no research to suggest that these would have worked. Reform must be guided by community empowerment and strong evidence, not by ideological warriors or romanticized images of leaders acting like they’re doing something, anything. Waiting for Superman has ignored deep historical and systemic problems in education such as segregation, property-tax based funding formulas, centralized textbook production, de-professionalization, inadequate special education supports, and the list goes on and on. People seeing Waiting for Superman should be mobilized to improve education. They just need to be willing to think outside of the narrow box that the film-makers have constructed to define what needs to be done.
The following are some facts, excerpted from “What ‘Superman’ got wrong, point by point,” published in the Washington Post on September 27, 2010. The article was written by Rick Ayers, a former high school teacher, founder of Communication Arts and Sciences small school at Berkeley High School, and currently adjunct professor in teacher education at the University of San Francisco.
Waiting for Superman says that lack of money is not the problem in education. The exclusive charter schools featured in the film receive large private subsidies. Two-thirds of Geoffrey Canada’s Harlem Children’s Zone funding comes from private sources. Public funding for urban programs is now being cut and progress is being eroded. Money matters!
Waiting for Superman implies that standardized testing is a reasonable way to assess student progress. Most test scores continue to reflect parental income and neighborhood/zip codes, not what schools do. As opportunity, health and family wealth increase, so do test scores. The tests are too narrow. When schools focus exclusively on boosting scores on standardized tests, they reduce teachers to test-prep clerks, ignore important subject areas and critical thinking skills, dumb down the curriculum and leave children less prepared for the future. We need much more authentic assessment to know if schools are doing well and to help them improve.
Waiting for Superman ignores overall problems of poverty. Schools and teachers take the blame for huge social inequities in housing, health care, and income. Income disparities between the richest and poorest in U.S.society have reached record levels between 1970 and today. Poor communities suffer extensive traumas and dislocations. Homelessness, the exploitation of immigrants, and the closing of community health and counseling clinics, are all factors that penetrate our school communities. Solutions that punish schools without addressing these conditions only increase the marginalization of poor children.
Waiting for Superman says teachers’ unions are the problem. Of course unions need to be improved – but before teachers unionized, the disparity in pay between men and women was disgraceful and the arbitrary power of school boards to dismiss teachers or raise class size without any resistance was endemic. Unions have historically played leading roles in improving public education, and most nations with strong public educational systems have strong teacher unions.
Waiting for Superman decries tenure as a drag on teacher improvement. Tenured teachers cannot be fired without due process and a good reason: they can’t be fired because the boss wants to hire his cousin, or because the teacher is gay (or black or…), or because they take an unpopular position on a public issue outside of school. When teachers are evaluated through a union-sanctioned peer process, more teachers are put into retraining programs and dismissed than through administration-only review programs.
Waiting for Superman says charter schools allow choice and better educational innovation. Charters were first proposed by the teachers’ unions to create schools that were free of administrative bureaucracy and open to experimentation and innovation. While teacher unions are vilified in the film, there is no mention of charter corruption or profiteering. A recent national study by CREDO, The Center for Research on Education Outcomes at Stanford University, concludes that only 17% of charter schools have better test scores than traditional public schools, 46% had gains that were no different than their public counterparts, and 37% were significantly worse. A recent Mathematica Policy Research study came to similar conclusions. And the Education Report, “The Evaluation of Charter School Impacts, concludes, “On average, charter middle schools that hold lotteries are neither more nor less successful than traditional public schools in improving student achievement, behavior, and school progress.”
Waiting for Superman glorifies lotteries for admission to highly selective and subsidized charter schools as evidence of the need for more of them. If education is a civil right, it can’t be distributed by a lottery. We must guarantee all students access to high quality early education, highly effective teachers, college and work-preparatory curricula & equitable instructional resources. In Superman, families are cruelly paraded in front of the cameras as they wait for an admission lottery in an auditorium where the winners’ names are pulled from a hat and read aloud, while the losing families trudge out in tears with cameras looming in their faces – in what amounts to family & child abuse.
Waiting for Superman says competition is the best way to improve learning. Too many people involved in education policy are dazzled by the idea of “market forces” improving schools. Teachers will be motivated to gather the most promising students, to hide curriculum strategies from peers, and to cheat; principals have already been caught cheating in a desperate attempt to boost test scores.In spite of the many millions of dollars poured into expounding the theory of paying teachers for higher student test scores, a new study by Vanderbilt University’s National Center on Performance Incentives found that the use of merit pay for teachers in the Nashville school district produced no difference even according to their measure, test outcomes for students.
Waiting for Superman contributes to the teacher-bashing culture which discourages talented college graduates from considering teaching and drives people out of the profession. According to the Department of Education, the country will need 1.6 million new teachers in the next five years. Retention of talented teachers is one key. Good teaching is about making connections to students, about connecting what they learn to the world in which they live, and this only happens if teachers have history and roots in the communities where they teach. A recent report by the nonprofit National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future says that “approximately a third of America’s new teachers leave teaching sometime during their first three years of teaching; almost half leave during the first five years. Check out the reasons teachers are being driven out in Katy Farber’s book, “Why Great Teachers Quit: And How We Might Stop the Exodus,” (Corwin Press).
Waiting for Superman says “we’re not producing large numbers of scientists and doctors in this country anymore. . . This means we are not only less educated, but also less economically competitive.” But Business Week (10/28/09) reported that “U.S. colleges and universities are graduating as many scientists and engineers as ever,” yet “the highest performing students are choosing careers in other fields.” In particular, the study found, “many of the top students have been lured to careers in finance and consulting.” It’s the market, and the disproportionately high salaries paid to finance specialists that is misdirecting human resources, not schools.
Waiting for Superman promotes a nutty theory of learning which claims that teaching is a matter of pouring information into children’s heads. In one of its many little cartoon segments, the film purports to show how kids learn. The top of a child’s head is cut open and a jumble of factoids is poured in. The film-makers betray a lack of understanding of how people actually learn, the active and engaged participation of students in the learning process. They ignore the social construction of knowledge, the difference between deep learning and rote memorization.
Waiting for Superman promotes the idea that we are in a dire war for US dominance in the world. The poster advertising the film shows a nightmarish battlefield in stark gray, with a little white girl sitting at a desk in the midst of it. The text: “The fate of our country won’t be decided on a battlefield. It will be determined in a classroom. But really, who declared this war? When did I as a teacher sign up as an officer in this war? And when did that 4th grade girl become a soldier in it? Instead of this new educational Cold War, perhaps we should be helping kids imagine a world of global cooperation, sustainable economies, and equity.
Waiting for Superman says federal “Race to the Top” education funds are being focused to support students who are not being served in other ways. According to a study by the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights under Law, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., Race to the Top funds are benefiting affluent or well-to-do, white, and “abled” students. So the outcome of No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top has been more funding for schools that are doing well and more discipline and narrow test-preparation for the poorest schools.
Waiting for Superman suggests that teacher improvement is a matter of increased control and discipline over teachers. Dan Brown, a teacher in the SEED charter school featured in the film, points out that successful schools involve teachers in strong collegial conversations. Teachers need to be accountable to a strong educational plan, without being terrorized. Good teachers, which is the vast majority of them, are seeking this kind of support from their leaders.
Waiting for Superman proposes a reform “solution” that exploits the feminization of the field of teaching; it proposes that teachers just need a few good men with hedge funds to come to the rescue. Teaching has been historically devalued – teachers are less well compensated and have less control of their working conditions than other professionals – because of its associations with women. For example, 97% of preschool and kindergarten teachers are women, and this is also the least well-compensated sector of teaching; in 2009, the lowest 10% earned $30,970 to $34,280; the top 10% earned $75,190 to $80,970. By comparison the top 25 hedge fund managers took in $25 billion in 2009, enough to hire 658,000 new teachers.
We at DeFENSE want to make sure we put the real facts in your hands.
Check out this interesting blog post from Schools Matter:
“…the Anschutz Foundation, chaired and financed by Philip, is quite fond of some of the biggest players in conservative education advocacy: the Manhattan Institute, Heritage Foundation, Cato Institute, Hoover Institution, and the American Enterprise Institute. The foundation also gives to the Freedom Works Foundation, Washington Legal Foundation, and various other influential think tanks/organizations. I won’t really get into it here, but it’s fair to say this foundation uses their philanthropic arm much the way the Koch brothers do: to further their own conservative agenda while creating a climate that is more friendly for their businesses.” (read more)
Also check out this great article by Barbara Miner at NOT Waiting for Superman:
Two decades ago, challenges to public schools were spearheaded by groups such as the Christian Coalition, a grassroots, church-based phenomenon that sought to abolish the U.S. Department of Education and to elect religious conservatives who could take over local and state school boards. Today’s bipartisan corporate reformers tend to sidestep democracy altogether by abolishing school boards, promoting mayoral control, and hiring corporate-style CEO’s who answer to a city’s power elite. No longer preoccupied with abolishing the U.S. Department of Education, they instead use their wealth to effectively control it and to dictate reform.
This developing alliance is evident in Waiting for Superman. (read more)
You know that mantra that the “education deformers” use, the one that “poverty doesn’t matter”? Well, that’s obviously where that comes from. Why bother worrying about whether kids have enough food in their bellies to pay attention when you can just give them charters?
Problem solved! Just don’t “trickle down” on our kids, please.
There will be a community information meeting next Tuesday, October 26th from 7:30 to 8:30 regarding Manny Martinez Middle School performance. Please join Superintendent Boasberg, Chief Academic Officer Susana Cordova and Board of Education Vice President Arturo Jimenez for a thoughtful community discussion on the next steps for Manny Martinez.
Meeting will start promptly at 7:30 in the cafeteria at West High School. Refreshments, childcare and translation to Spanish will be provided.
This is the first of many community conversations in the West high School community that we hope you will have with us to support and understand community and student needs.
Let’s talk about the truth here. Manny Martinez, named after a much beloved Latino west side patriarch, has been performing abysmally. It is the “worst-performing” school in the district, and it’s been plagued with weak leadership and serious discipline problems. Many people on the non-collaborative reform side really want to see this school closed because it makes all other charters look bad.
However, to close this middle school will mean further destabilization of West High School, simply because there are no other middle schools that will feed into it. There are currently no middle school options in that area. The school board recently voted to restructure Greenlee K-8 and reverted it to a K-5. There has been a fear that the district will be moving to close West High School and will be handed over to a DSST or some other charter high school.
There has been a shift in demographics, as the Baker neighborhood is yet another in the long line of gentrified Denver neighborhoods, but there is still a significant Chicano and immigrant Latino population there.
DeFENSErs, show up to this meeting and support the Westside community members that have already started to organize to support the West High students. Let’s bear witness to the discussion beginning there, as we knit the overall DPS strategy together with the destabilization of the Montbello neighborhood schools.
What’s with the experimentation on Black and Latino students?
GreenDot America, a charter school organization, is opening up its invitation list to their special screening of Waiting for Superman. This screening will be followed by a panel discussion, and at last report, the panel will include state senator Michael Johnston, Dr. Nate Easley, a parent, a student and possibly DeFENSE’s own Lisa Calderon.
The event is on Friday, October 22 at 6:45 p.m., and RSVPs are being taken at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The flier is above. Please share! We need as much pro-neighborhood school representation as possible.
An out-of-state special interest group fueled by oil company dollars is “organizing” parents in North Denver. Stand for Children came to Denver to elect pro-charter school board candidates to the Denver School Board
(“Stand for Children’s first push in Colorado is the election for Denver’s school board — the governing body that is effectively Boasberg’s boss”— Denver Post, 9/29/2009)
Do we need pro-charter, oil money fueled organizations telling us how to vote in North Denver? Do we want out-of-state special interests targeting our elected officials? We don’t need organizations spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to attack our representatives.
Stand’s ties to right-wing political operatives is clear….
While Stand claims to be a parent organization that supports education, in reality it is an “astroturf” (fake grassroots) organization that works to elect anti-education funding Republicans in Denver, pumping money and volunteers into an effort to defeat Democratic legislator Rep. Dan Kagan in House District Three
Stand uses a shadowy “527” organization to bring out-of-state corporate money into Colorado, to fund their operations against school board members and other elected officials that fight for neighborhood schools.
Stand has raised over $120,000 since August alone, making it the biggest repository of big money in education “reform” in Colorado.
Huge donations come from Chicago (Bruce Rauner, $49,995) and New York (Jonathon Gray, $29,995). Over 72% of Stand’s donors are from outside of Colorado, according to recent campaign finance filings. Using a 527 allows Stand to white-wash giant corporate contributions before they are spent in local school board races.